<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Post revisions: friend or foe?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wp-fun.co.uk/2009/01/24/post-revisions-freind-or-foe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2009/01/24/post-revisions-freind-or-foe/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:56:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Post revisions: friend or foe? - WP FUN &#124; oztq.com</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2009/01/24/post-revisions-freind-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-1308</link>
		<dc:creator>Post revisions: friend or foe? - WP FUN &#124; oztq.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/?p=1121?evp=1121#comment-1308</guid>
		<description>[...] Post revisions: friend or foe? - WP FUN [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Post revisions: friend or foe? &#8211; WP FUN [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicky</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2009/01/24/post-revisions-freind-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/?p=1121?evp=1121#comment-1307</guid>
		<description>In its current implementation post revisions are definitely a foe. For starters, revisions should not be stored in the posts table. The way it works now, the only reason why this type of strict revisioning is needed is if you&#039;re running a wiki.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that there should be options within WordPress to manage its use as opposed to mucking around with the config file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In its current implementation post revisions are definitely a foe. For starters, revisions should not be stored in the posts table. The way it works now, the only reason why this type of strict revisioning is needed is if you&#39;re running a wiki.</p>
<p>I agree that there should be options within WordPress to manage its use as opposed to mucking around with the config file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grammar police</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2009/01/24/post-revisions-freind-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator>grammar police</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 05:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/?p=1121?evp=1121#comment-1306</guid>
		<description>Oh sure - take the easy way out. Plugin you want, plugin you get.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/delete-revision/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/delete-revi...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh sure &#8211; take the easy way out. Plugin you want, plugin you get.  <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/delete-revision/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/delete-revi.." rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/delete-revi..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Rickmann</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2009/01/24/post-revisions-freind-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-1305</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Rickmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/?p=1121?evp=1121#comment-1305</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up on the mistype.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the SQL front there are a lot of things I could do with SQL. I could write my posts entirely in SQL if I wanted to, but that would entirely defeat the purpose of WordPress wouldn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up on the mistype.</p>
<p>On the SQL front there are a lot of things I could do with SQL. I could write my posts entirely in SQL if I wanted to, but that would entirely defeat the purpose of WordPress wouldn&#39;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grammarpolice</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2009/01/24/post-revisions-freind-or-foe/comment-page-1/#comment-1304</link>
		<dc:creator>grammarpolice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 03:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/?p=1121?evp=1121#comment-1304</guid>
		<description>freINDs can be friENDs in the end. I before E except after C. The Grammar Police commeth and want to know why you have spellcheck turned off. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously though, there is a mySQL command you can use to delete prior versions of posts if you didn&#039;t already add the plugin as discussed on &lt;a href=&quot;http://WPTavern.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WPTavern.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>freINDs can be friENDs in the end. I before E except after C. The Grammar Police commeth and want to know why you have spellcheck turned off. </p>
<p>Seriously though, there is a mySQL command you can use to delete prior versions of posts if you didn&#39;t already add the plugin as discussed on <a href="http://WPTavern.com" rel="nofollow">WPTavern.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
