<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/10/06/back-to-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/10/06/back-to-the-future/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:46:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julian Gruber</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/10/06/back-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Gruber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/?p=551#comment-979</guid>
		<description>Dito, this would really be the solution. WP 2.6 and Dreamhost for example at the moment...really hard when it comes to performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dito, this would really be the solution. WP 2.6 and Dreamhost for example at the moment&#8230;really hard when it comes to performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/10/06/back-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/?p=551#comment-978</guid>
		<description>Occasionally I go back to WP 1.5 to check out the backwards compatibility of something, and I&#039;m always amazed at how much faster the admin for 1.5 is.

I sometimes think that WP would be better as a stripped-down core package, with much of the popular stuff---TinyMCE, Widgets, Auto-upgrade, etc.---as bundled plugins.  There would be a number of benefits for speed, security, and flexibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Occasionally I go back to WP 1.5 to check out the backwards compatibility of something, and I&#8217;m always amazed at how much faster the admin for 1.5 is.</p>
<p>I sometimes think that WP would be better as a stripped-down core package, with much of the popular stuff&#8212;TinyMCE, Widgets, Auto-upgrade, etc.&#8212;as bundled plugins.  There would be a number of benefits for speed, security, and flexibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Rickmann</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/10/06/back-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Rickmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/?p=551#comment-977</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, Good point Jeff. I never even knew it was there and I don&#039;t see the point.

I said as much in the survey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, Good point Jeff. I never even knew it was there and I don&#8217;t see the point.</p>
<p>I said as much in the survey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffro2pt0</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/10/06/back-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffro2pt0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/?p=551#comment-976</guid>
		<description>Perhaps part of the problem is that, there are so many people using WordPress in this day in age that the things you don&#039;t used are being used by some other group of individuals giving those features at least a little bit of worth. But, I think a good example of what you are talking about is the search in the admin panel. Who uses that thing lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps part of the problem is that, there are so many people using WordPress in this day in age that the things you don&#8217;t used are being used by some other group of individuals giving those features at least a little bit of worth. But, I think a good example of what you are talking about is the search in the admin panel. Who uses that thing lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
