<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Link Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:56:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Six Ways to Tell Your Readers Apart Through Comments &#124; The Reader Appreciation Project</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Six Ways to Tell Your Readers Apart Through Comments &#124; The Reader Appreciation Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/#comment-554</guid>
		<description>[...] a commenter&#8217;s name as well as a URL is another way to help distinguish between commenters. Many commenters might have the same name [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a commenter&#8217;s name as well as a URL is another way to help distinguish between commenters. Many commenters might have the same name [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inspirationbit</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>inspirationbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 06:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/#comment-553</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind no linked names at all. That&#039;s not the reason why I comment on people&#039;s blogs. But like Louis, I prefer to have a clickable link, instead of select+copy+past - just being lazy here ;-)

It is an interesting experiment nevertheless. Curious to see the results and findings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind no linked names at all. That&#8217;s not the reason why I comment on people&#8217;s blogs. But like Louis, I prefer to have a clickable link, instead of select+copy+past &#8211; just being lazy here ;-)</p>
<p>It is an interesting experiment nevertheless. Curious to see the results and findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poll: Turning Off Links in Comments &#187; Reader Appreciation Project</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Poll: Turning Off Links in Comments &#187; Reader Appreciation Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/#comment-547</guid>
		<description>[...] Rather than decide whether to implement Do-Follow or No-Follow in his comment&#8217;s section, he has decided to turn off links completely. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rather than decide whether to implement Do-Follow or No-Follow in his comment&#8217;s section, he has decided to turn off links completely. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Rickmann</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Rickmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Thanks Louis,

There is every chance that it won&#039;t work with cocomment, but I don&#039;t know how it works so I can&#039;t say for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Louis,</p>
<p>There is every chance that it won&#8217;t work with cocomment, but I don&#8217;t know how it works so I can&#8217;t say for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Liem</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Liem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 13:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/#comment-552</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind no-following at all. but i prefer a live link (nonfollowed) than a plain text. it saves a bit of microcalories for extra clicks and paste it to my address bar.
off topic: does your comment section work with cocomment? i don&#039;t see my cocomment here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind no-following at all. but i prefer a live link (nonfollowed) than a plain text. it saves a bit of microcalories for extra clicks and paste it to my address bar.<br />
off topic: does your comment section work with cocomment? i don&#8217;t see my cocomment here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Rickmann</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Rickmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ronald,

I was thinking about using some Javascript to make them clickable but I thought I would go for something a little more extreme for the purposes of the debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ronald,</p>
<p>I was thinking about using some Javascript to make them clickable but I thought I would go for something a little more extreme for the purposes of the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald @ RA Project</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald @ RA Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Now that I&#039;ve seen your implementation, I quite like it.  Not sure what&#039;ll happen with long URLs though :)

Maybe perhaps a little DOM implementation where when a user hovers over it, it changes into a clickable link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I&#8217;ve seen your implementation, I quite like it.  Not sure what&#8217;ll happen with long URLs though :)</p>
<p>Maybe perhaps a little DOM implementation where when a user hovers over it, it changes into a clickable link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald @ RA Project</title>
		<link>http://wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald @ RA Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 07:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wp-fun.co.uk/2008/03/01/link-controversy/#comment-549</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll definitely be following this and perhaps doing a quick case study on the potential of de-linking commenter&#039;s names in the section.

It&#039;s a good idea in a sense of eliminating do-follow and no-follow from the equation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll definitely be following this and perhaps doing a quick case study on the potential of de-linking commenter&#8217;s names in the section.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good idea in a sense of eliminating do-follow and no-follow from the equation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
