Ferodynamics Network

popular: profile privacy, mobile privacy

November 8, 2007

I think you should give objects a try, for more reasons than just avoiding naming collisions. Here’s why.

I think I’m a pretty typical Wordpress user. I learned a lot of my PHP by playing with themes to get them to do things they didn’t by default. So when I decided to write a plugin I pretty much hacked it together using the guidance that was available.

The only real introduction I had to objects when I started writing plugins was a brief piece about avoiding naming collisisons. None of the guidance seemed to offer more than that so I never really gave it much thought.

Typically my plugins were structured something like this:

[php]
//plugin headers

class myClass {
function myFunction() {
//do stuff
}

}

add_action('wp-head',array('myClass','myFunction'));

There isn’t anything wrong with this, but classes can do so much more once they are instantiated as an object. Typically I now structure my plugins more like this:

[php]

class myClass(){

function myClass(){
//php 4 compliant constructor

add_action('wp-head',array(&$this,'myFunction'));

}

function myFunction(){

//do stuff

}

}

if (class_exists('myClass')) {
$myClass = new myClass();
}

So what are the advantages? The real benefits are simply those gained by using object oriented code versus procedural code. The code becomes easier to maintain and easier to reuse the individual functions in other classes.

It can also be useful for abstracting the administrative content away from the actual code you are modifying; for example, I have found it useful to load all of the plugin options using the constructor and keep them in an internal variable for later use by whichever functions happen to need it using something like this:

[php]
class myClass{

function myClass(){

$this->options = get_option('myPluginOptions');
add_filter('the_content',array(&$this,'myFunction'));

}

function myFunction($content){

if ($this->options['wrap-content'] == true) {
return '

'.$content.'

';
} else {
return $content;
}

}
}

So, if you are not already instantiating your classes, then I suggest you consider it. You might even enjoy it.

Html 5 Gallery
6 comments
page 1305
Html 5 Gallery
6 comments
page 1305
Silence Is Golden
3 comments
page 213
Questions About Habari For Wordpress Users
6 comments
page 424
Theming Habari Vs Wordpress
13 comments
page 440
My Experience Of Flexx
4 comments
page 1026
Plugin Update Fun With Photo Data 2
one comment
page 815
Post Image The Easy Peasy Way
26 comments
page 1065
Categories Vs Tags Either Neither Or Both
12 comments
page 7
Gaining Benefits From Plugins
8 comments
page 1167
Fun With Theme Widgets
24 comments
page 867
Beware Wp Cache
8 comments
page 1310
Six Million Ways To Die Choose One
14 comments
page 1128
Post Image The Easy Peasy Way
26 comments
page 1065
Post Image The Easy Peasy Way
26 comments
page 1065
Wordpress Chat
one comment
page 1308
Post Image The Easy Peasy Way
26 comments
page 1065
Wordpress Chat
one comment
page 1308
Beware Wp Cache
8 comments
page 1310
Wp Polls Reviewed
one comment
page 58
Fun With Photo Data
12 comments
page 330
Fun With Sidebar Tabs Styling
2 comments
page 336
Html 5 Gallery
6 comments
page 1305
Using Your Own Url Shortener
4 comments
page 1190
Html 5 Gallery
6 comments
page 1305
My Experience Of Flexx
4 comments
page 1026
Fun With Sidebar Tabs
193 comments
page 57
Html 5 Gallery
6 comments
page 1305
Fun With Plugins
27 comments
page 14
Wordpress 25 Exif Fields
12 comments
page 230
Html 5 Gallery
6 comments
page 1305
Html 5 Gallery
6 comments
page 1305
Html 5 Gallery
6 comments
page 1305
Quick N Dirty Replacement Text
no comment
page 122
Beware Wp Cache
8 comments
page 1310
Theming Habari Vs Wordpress
13 comments
page 440
  updated 1 seconds ago
Wednesday, 7am
Kaloyan K. Tsvetkov

Nice article. I myself also use a objects for my WP plugins. The only difference is that I kickstart them in a more spartan way – just calling something like this:

Class wp_something {

}
new wp_something;

because, actually, I only need to run the constructor of the class – I do not need a variable storing the created object ;)

Saturday, 9am
Andrew Rickmann

Oops, in all the time I’ve been using WordPress I hadn’t noticed. Thanks John.

Saturday, 3am
johnbillion

Andrew, I know I should be worrying about more pressing issues, but you know it’s WordPress (with a capital P) and not Wordpress don’t you?

That caveat aside, this is a nice little site you’ve got here. I’ll subscribe once you change the title ;-)

Keep up the good work.

Friday, 8pm
Andrew Rickmann

Fullo, I did know about the PHP 5 fallback which is why I felt secure in using it; however, it is something that needs to be considered as PHP 6 won’t have it any more.

I guess it really is a case of deciding how long the plugin is likely to be around, and whether you want to support it later in its life to upgrade to PHP 6.

Having said that many hosts are only now getting up to PHP 5. If PHP 6 won’t be backward compatible then I guess you need to wonder how long it will really be until PHP 6 is offered. We could be facing up to 5 years before it becomes well supported.

That’s a long time for a plugin.

Friday, 4pm
fullo

as I know call_user_function_array can be used to call statically an object method.

But I don’t know if there are some valid reasons to not use __contruct($args) { $this->myClass($args) ); as you suggest.

Btw, I’ve studied a little more and I’ve discovered that

“To ease the transition from PHP 4, if PHP 5 cannot find a method names __construct() within your object hierarchy, it revers to the PHP 4 constructor naming scheme and searches accordingly” (from “Upgrading to PHP5″ Adam
Trachtenberg (O’Reilly))

however, IMHO, this should not be used. Especially if you work with object that extends other object. Because it should be very easy to break your code simply changing the name of the parent class [parent::MyParent ==> parent::NewParentName ].

Friday, 10am
Andrew Rickmann

Thanks Fullo. I did consider doing something like this but my desire to simplify often gets the better of me.

Is there a benefit to using call_user_function over simply calling myClass from within the __construct method?

Friday, 9am
fullo

nice tutorial, but instead of use a php4-only object you should create a php5, or crosscompatible, object.

ie.
class myClass(){

function __construct(){
// do something
}

function myClass($args){
//php 4 compliant fake constructor
$args = func_get_args();
call_user_func_array(array(&$this, ‘__construct’), $args);

}